Clarytrade
20 brokers indexedcommission weighted 0%
Clarytrade research

The three ways broker licence numbers go wrong

We register-checked 58 broker licence records against official regulator registers. 14 needed correcting — and the errors repeat in three patterns anyone can learn to catch.

A broker licence number is the single fact retail traders are told to rely on — and it is copied between websites far more often than it is checked. When we built our licence-evidence log we compiled records from the same public information every comparison site, review and forum post reads. Then we checked each record against the regulator's own register.

14 of the 58 records we have finished checking (24%) turned out to be wrong and were corrected — every correction is logged publicly. The point of this study is not the individual mistakes; it is that they cluster into three repeatable patterns, each of which defeats a different lazy way of "verifying" a licence — and each of which has a simple counter-move.

Informational only — not financial advice. The corrected values were errors in our own compiled records, caught by our register checks; this study does not claim any broker published them. Licences and statuses change — verify on the official register before depositing.

Key numbers

What the register checks found (as of September 2026)

Every figure is computed live from the licence-evidence log. Records not yet checked first-hand are labelled pending — never counted as verified.

100
licence records in the log
58
register checks completed
24%
of completed checks needed correction
4
numbers registered to a different firm
5
near-miss wrong numbers
5
stale statuses
Pattern 1 of 3

Another firm's licence

A real, active licence number — registered to a different company

How to catch it: Existence is not enough. These numbers are real and return an active, authorised firm — just not the one you're checking. Match the exact legal entity name on the register entry against the name on your client agreement.
BrandWhat circulatedWhat the register showsChecked
PU Prime
SCB
Bahamas SCB SIA-F216 — registered to Trade Nation LtdNo Bahamas licence for this brand at allJun 2026
StarTrader
FSCA
FSCA FSP 50926 — registered to FP MarketsFSP 52464 (StarTrader International Pty Ltd)Jun 2026
XTB
DFSA
DFSA F003484 — registered to XM's Dubai entityF006316 (XTB MENA Limited) · registerAug 2026
Capital.com
FSA
Seychelles FSA SD150 — registered to Trade NationSD101 (Capital Com Stock and CFD Investing Ltd)Aug 2026
Pattern 2 of 3

Near-miss numbers

A plausible-looking licence number that is simply wrong

How to catch it: Search the number on the regulator's own register, not on Google. A near-miss number looks right in a footer or a review — it fails the moment the register returns no entry (or a different firm).
BrandWhat circulatedWhat the register showsChecked
FXTM
CMA
CMA licence 122Licence 135 (Exinity Capital East Africa Ltd) · registerAug 2026
VT Markets
FSC
FSC licence GB23201266GB23202269 (VT Markets Ltd)Jun 2026
PU Prime
FSCA
FSCA FSP 51298FSP 52218 (PU Prime (Pty) Ltd)Jun 2026
StarTrader
FSC
FSC licence GB22200717GB24203371 (STARTRADER Financial Markets Limited)Jun 2026
Blueberry Markets
ASIC
ASIC AFSL 463745AFSL 535887 (Blueberry Australia Pty Ltd)Jun 2026
Pattern 3 of 3

Stale status

A licence whose status changed after the information was written

How to catch it: Check the status and the date, not just the entry. Licences get withdrawn, suspended and upgraded; information written last year can be wrong today. Registers show current status — reviews rarely do.
BrandWhat circulatedWhat the register showsChecked
FXTM
FCA
FCA 777911 (Exinity UK Ltd) presented as active oversightStatus 'Authorised — applied to cancel' on the FCA Register API, 26 Aug 2026; removed from the FXTM profile · registerSept 2026
FXTM
FSCA
FSCA FSP 46614, held by 'ForexTime Ltd'ForexTime Ltd's FSCA application is 'Application Withdrawn'; the group's approved South African provider is Exinity Limited, which the broker discloses as FSP 50320 · registerSept 2026
FXTM
CySEC
CySEC CIF 185/12 listed as activeCIF authorisation withdrawn 20 May 2024Jun 2026
Tickmill
Labuan FSA
Labuan money-broking licence MB/18/0028 listed as currentSurrendered effective 10 Jan 2025, per Labuan FSA's own surrendered/revoked listAug 2026
OKX
VARA
VARA licence described as provisionalFull active VASP licence on the VARA register · registerJun 2026
The extreme end

Clone firms weaponise the same confusion

What happens when the wrong-firm pattern is done on purpose.

Everything above was error. Clone firms do it deliberately: they quote a genuine firm's licence number and name so that a victim who checks "does this number exist?" gets a reassuring yes. The FCA maintains a public list of clone-firm warnings — including, for example, a warning about a clone that borrowed the identity of a genuine FCA-authorised brokerage. The counter-move is the same as for the wrong-firm pattern: match the exact entity name, the licence number and the contact details on the register entry — and search the regulator's warning list for the brand too. How clone firms work →

Risk warning. CFDs and leveraged products are complex and high-risk. You can lose more than you deposit. Between 62% and 78% of retail CFD accounts lose money. Only trade with money you can afford to lose.
Methodology

How this study was produced

  • • The dataset is our own licence-evidence log: every licence record we publish, with a status of verified, corrected or pending. This page recomputes from it on every build.
  • • A record is corrected only after a first-hand check against the regulator's official register (or the regulator's own published documents); the previous wrong value is preserved in the log.
  • • Patterns are assigned from the correction notes; the before/after values on this page quote those notes verbatim.
  • Commission weighting: 0%. Affiliate relationships never change a verification status or which corrections we publish.
  • • Corrections are also listed in our public corrections log.
Limitations

What this study does not claim

  • • The wrong values were in our own compiled records, sourced from public broker information. We do not attribute the origin of any individual error to a broker, and this study is not a claim of wrongdoing by any firm named.
  • • Figures are a point-in-time snapshot (September 2026) and recompute as records are re-checked; 42 records are still pending first-hand verification.
  • • A corrected licence record says nothing about a broker's quality or safety — only that a published number and the register disagreed until checked.
  • • Informational only — not financial advice. Always verify the entity, number and status on the official register before depositing.
Go deeper

Verify it yourself

Share

Cite this study

Clarytrade, a broker-research database, checked 58 broker licence records against official regulator registers; 14 (24%) required correction. The errors cluster into three patterns: licence numbers registered to a different firm (4 cases), near-miss wrong numbers (5), and stale licence statuses (5). Snapshot: 2026-09-09. Method & corrections log: clarytrade.com/methodology · clarytrade.com/editorial-policy#corrections. Verification queries: hello@clarytrade.com.

Please link to clarytrade.com/research/licence-confusions when citing. Figures recompute as records are re-checked — quote the snapshot date alongside any number.

Coverage: TradeInformer, 18 Aug 2026 — "Clarytrade finds 31% of checked broker licence claims needed correction."

Check a broker before you deposit